top of page

In Tuesday's lesson within the unit, Film Genres and National Cinemas, students began their investigation into science fiction (or sci-fi) genre films. One of the key focuses areas of this lesson was filmmaking technology, and its effect on the sci fi genre specifically. In the case of the first Avatar movie (2009), James Cameron waited over ten years to make it. As well as this being an expensive project, this was how long it took for cinematographic technology to be at a level that enabled Cameron to give shape to his vision. When comparing Blade Runner (1982) with Blade Runner 2049 (2017) in class, the students could certainly see the heightened level of realism that was achievable by filmmakers 35 years later, (while still being able to preserve the same iconic aesthetic originally crafted by Ridley Scott). Through considering sci-fi films from various decades and national contexts, it became apparent that the rate in which our cinematographic technology increases has a direct correlation with how well filmmakers can represent their idea of the future on the big screen. In the case of the newcomer flick and instant success, M3GAN (2023), the possibility of having a deadly smart android packaged as a kids toy becomes highly believable, and thanks to the level of special effects currently accessible by filmmakers, M3GAN seamlessly becomes “part of the family” with ease and grace, reserving any campy ‘evil doll cringe’ for Chucky in Child’s Play (1988).


I knew as soon as I saw the trailer for M3GAN that it was a must see for me. I even included it in this unit prior to its release on January 6th 2023 in the USA. At the time, I was in New York City with my family for the holiday season, and seeing M3GAN posters pop up around Manhattan was a constant and consistent source of thrills for me. While I’m not always a person to be ‘first in line’ to see anything, I was determined to see M3GAN on the day it came out, so that I could experience it in a way that was completely fresh; free from pretences, talk on the street, or ‘spoiler free’ articles. Upon seeing this film, I was delighted as it not only met but surpassed my high expectations. M3GAN, a golden haired pretty and petite 4 feet tall dolly stepped up high in her debut to be amongst the best fictional androids in cinematic history.


One of things that certainly delighted viewers of M3GAN was the accurate and culturally relevant parody of the tech industry, and of modern parents and their approach to raising our young leaders of tomorrow. While the story of M3GAN was co-written and co-produced by horror film mastermind, James Wan (known for his work in the Saw, Insidious, and The Conjuring franchises), M3GAN certainly had a lot to say about our approach to using technology, and our unpreparedness to utilise it, especially as it evolves into something far more sophisticated, thoughtful, and calculating than any human being on Earth.



The main source of humour for viewers is the clearly debilitating hubris of humans and their reckless dependence and manipulation of technology. When faced with the tragedy of her sister and brother-in-law’s death, roboticist Gemma takes custody of her niece Cady with almost inhumane reluctance. While Aunt Gemma is clearly the ‘cool aunt’, being the designer of Furby like ‘Perpetual Pets’ interactive toys for Funki (sounding much like Funko), she certainly prefers a hands off and non-committal approach to personal relationships. Even the point of her creations is to avoid the concept of death. While real pets die, Perpetual Pets like real life Furby and FurReal Hasbro toys last forever. Even if they break, they can be fixed. Rather than engaging meaningfully with Cady and a sound child psychological rehabilitation program, after seeing Cady’s face light up when meeting her college robot project, ‘Bruce’, she instead chooses to use her unapproved basement project, M3GAN as a distraction for Cady. Despite portraying clear red flags of not being ready for mass production, such as pulling a mischievous grin when on the ‘confused’ facial setting (M3GAN is never confused!), and literally exploding into flames when shown to her fast moving, results driven boss, Gemma pushes towards a quick repair, makeover, and bonding of M3GAN to Cady, an unbreakable relationship key to both the development of the robot and child alike. In a quick montage, M3GAN’s impenetrable titanium exoskeleton is covered over in soft silicone. She is given a sweet rounded face with oversized blue anime eyes, and rosebud lips, and is accessorised with a goldilocks wig, a cutesy baby doll dress, and ballet flats. While she may look to a doll, there is certainly more than meets the eye with M3GAN, but in an effort to quickly regain her independence and achieve success and recognition at work in exchange for having to deal with her traumatised and lonely niece, Gemma jumps the gun in more ways than one.


So far, I have seen the film twice, the second time being a week later at the Lincoln Cinema in New York (honestly, as soon as the movie finished, I wanted to see it again). Between and after viewings, one question that has sat heavily with me was who was truly responsible for the tragedy involving M3GAN. While the on screen bloodshed was kept to a minimum to keep to the PG-13 rating, M3GAN slowly accumulated a formidable kill count throughout the film. Despite this however, I do not believe M3GAN is to blame for any of these deaths. That would be like blaming the machine gun for a fatal shooting, or a shark for a shark attack when the swimmer was in their territory. While the film was partly marketed as an ‘evil doll’ movie, there is no ‘ghost in the machine’ or ‘demonic possession’, rather M3GAN was built with an evolving AI that was far more advanced than that of the human brain. Despite her appearance as a 9 year old, M3GAN is not given what she needs to develop a sufficient moral compass. While she is able to look up anything on the internet in her head, she isn’t ever told what to look for, and the only explicit direction she is given is to keep Cady safe from physical and emotional harm. When considering this, M3GAN succeeds in doing this. The neighbour’s dog physically harms Cady, and the bully, Brandon at the day camp is both physically and emotionally harmful. When Cady asks M3GAN later if she hurt the bully, M3GAN has to make her own interpretation and moral judgement regarding her actions. As she is not given sufficient parameters in order to assess what to do to keep Cady from harm, she doesn’t see what she does as over the top, but as merely removing a threat to her child. While her actions are terrible, M3GAN is given no way to keep herself in check, and must improvise as she adapts to our world.


Upon reflection, M3GAN is very much like some of my favourite anti-hero androids and ‘humanoid creations’ of all time. The android named Ava in Ex Machina (2014) is revealed to be manipulative and is only playing the ‘damsel in distress’ role in order to avoid destruction, and break free and live as a human. While she may be seen as the villain, the true villain like in Mary Shelley’s novel Frankenstein (1818), and Blade Runner (1982) is her creator. In Ex Machina, Nathan creates robots because he can, with little regard for whether or not he is creating a being that can actually feel and want things for themselves. He uses them as puppets for his own selfish purposes, and destroys and rebuilds them from scratch on a whim. In Frankenstein, Victor wants to create a living being in order to triumph in science, however abandons his creature who, while hideous, was as innocent and helpless as a baby. It is only after being left to the mercy of a cruel and unaccepting world that the creature (who never even gets given a name) becomes cold and plagued with a murderous thirst for revenge. In Blade Runner, replicants are made in the spirit of their marketing slogan “more human than human” by the Tyrell Corporation, but can only be found to be synthetic humans after undergoing lengthy interview styled tests. Despite this, they are treated as slaves, but seen as evil when they want to live their own lives. M3GAN is clearly made to be capable of so much, and with complexity and an attention to detail beyond human capacity. Despite this however, she is literally reduced to a play thing, intended for mass production and corporate profit. This is made clear in a scene where M3GAN watches Cady play outside. Through various point of view shots in the film, the audience can see how M3GAN can assess the emotional responses of people. In a shot like his, she watches Cady, but is then shown to notice a butterfly. From behind the glass, she watches as it ascends freely into the sky, symbolising and exemplifying the level of freedom she is denied. This moment of seeing M3GAN as a poetic and soulful being is then sharply interrupted by Cady, who shoots a toy arrow at M3GAN. When the arrow’s suction cup sticks to the window in front of her face, Cady playfully exclaims “You’re dead!” Considering times like these, it is no wonder that M3GAN develops a flippant response to death. I remember feeling sad for M3GAN as she goes back to looking for toy arrows with Cady, and fulfilling the role as a glorified but unpaid babysitter while Gemma enjoys time to herself.


While I am certain M3GAN is not the villain of this story, I wouldn’t say Gemma is either. The real problem is systemic, and society wide. In many respects, Gemma acts like a classic white millennial woman, who with her access to technology and modern convenience does not find it difficult to pass minor or even major problems off to someone (or in this case, something else) to handle. In a digitalised world centred on instant gratification, people no longer feel as though they are ‘fobbing off’ their responsibilities when they take shortcuts. Phrases like ‘work smarter, not harder’ can blur the line between neglect and resourceful ingenuity. Notions such as ‘any repetitive work should be automated’ have already taken their fair share of jobs from humans, but in turn have provided roles in the tech industry that continue to pop up like daisies out of the earth every day. There is however a line that is crossed if a creation is able to completely replace and outdo the capabilities of a human. For example, spell check software can be great for a student, however it is important that they still do their research and construct a response in their own words. For Gemma, rather than M3GAN being a complimenting tool in her parenting, she becomes a replacement, and very much like a big sister and role model to Cady. Just because M3GAN listens to, plays with, and educates Cady, doesn’t mean that it was the right decision for Gemma to sit back and leave the reins attended by her creation. Morally, while M3GAN is not real, I think there's certainly cause for further reflection on how she is regarded and treated. Just because M3GAN is efficient and capable of doing a lot, doesn’t mean that she should be overworked and exploited. In many respects, the way in which M3GAN repurposes features that were given to her for selfish reasons, such as her titanium exoskeleton being for the purpose of making her a highly durable toy that would not break easily, is inspired, and allows her to form a love/hate relationship with the audience. While we may get chills down our spine when we hear M3GAN sing “I am titanium!” from David Guetta’s 2011 hit pop song featuring Aussie singer Sia (she is titanium strong, and knows it!) , it is almost impossible not to shake our heads at Gemma and her team who unknowingly built a close to unstoppable killing machine, and then pushed to mass produce and sell them as life sized and animated $10,000 American Girl dolls.


P.S. Not long after the fantastic box office performance of the film, Universal set an inevitable release date for a sequel. With a budget of just $12 million, M3GAN made $173.1 million at the box office, and despite the glaring lack of merchandise (where can I buy a M3GAN Pop Vinyl already?), the film has gathered a wide fan base around the world. M3GAN 2.0 will be coming out on January 17 in 2025. I certainly will be first in line.



References:


D’Alessandro. (2023). "‘M3GAN 2.0’ To Happen In 2025”, https://deadline.com/2023/01/m3gan-2-release-date-1235226429/, accessed on 10/3/23

Universal Pictures. (2022). “M3GAN - official trailer”, online video, viewed on 10/3/23, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRb4U99OU80&t=17s

7Clouds. 2019, David Guetta - Titanium (Lyrics) ft. Sia, online video, viewed on 10 March 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KxnpFKZowcs

15 views0 comments

In Friday's lesson within the unit, Film Genres and National Cinemas, students continued their investigation into biopic genre films. After considering a wide range of films (with some being a lot more accurate to the original story than others), the class certainly could see the power of filmic representation, and a film’s ability to inspire, inform, and entertain audiences, as well as being able to commemorate significant people, and learn from their life experiences. After diving into a range of case study examples including Elvis (2022), The Imitation Game (2014), The Greatest Showman (2017) (see my previous blog here), and Lincoln (2012) to name a few, for this blog, students were tasked with proposing a concept for a biopic film. Students were to pick a person they know of that would be a great subject of a biopic film, and outline why this person’s story is relevant to audiences today. The person in question may already have a biopic, but may be in need of an updated depiction. For my blog, I will state the case for why St. Mary MacKillop would be a fascinating person to celebrate and get to know on the silver screen.


While I may be a tad biased in arriving at my section (I am in MacKillop house at St. Luke’s, and was also in MacKillop house as a high school student myself), growing up with a Catholic school education allowed for me to learn about and from the example set by Mary MacKillop from a young age. Mary MacKillop was a religious sister, but also a passionate teacher. Having both parents as teachers, and now being a teacher myself along with my sister, I can certainly see the wonderful impact that a passionate educator can have on the youth of today and the leaders of tomorrow. Mary MacKillop’s well known phrase “never see a need without doing something about it” has always been a source of inspiration for me. Even those who are not teachers can certainly live out this message, and like in the story of the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37), can resist the urge to walk past someone in need of a helping hand. Instead, we can do what we are able to do in order to make a life changing difference for someone else, even if they are a complete stranger. While Uncle Ben in Spider-Man (2002) tells Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) that “with great power comes great responsibility”, it doesn’t necessarily require someone to have super powers to be a hero, and advocate for those who are in need.


Saint Mary MacKillop (or Saint Mary of the Cross) is also a true example of resilience and unbreakable faith in the face of adversity. Even after being excommunicated by the Catholic Church in September of 1871 (a decision that was reversed when Mary was on her deathbed in 1909), Mary was steadfast and continued to work hard in establishing schools, up skilling sisters to become fantastic teachers, and bringing quality Catholic education to children, especially those who were facing poverty and hardship. While not everyone finds themselves in the same position as Mary MacKillop, struggling to remain strong and true when times are tough is a universal theme, and something that every person on the planet can relate with. Mary’s unshakable faith and commitment to Catholicism and God is also a wonderful example of the strength of human character. Despite engaging in hard situations, and with people who behaved in a less than Christ-like manner, she was able to graciously turn the other cheek, and continue working towards making her dream come true for herself as her calling, and for others as her gift to the world.


Upon researching, while Mary MacKillop was the subject of an Australian dramatised documentary in 1994 called Mary, so much more has happened since this time that is worth acknowledging and celebrating. Since the film came out, Mary MacKillop “was beatified on 19 January 1995 at Randwick Racecourse, Sydney, in a Mass celebrated by Pope John Paul II. She was canonised as Saint Mary of the Cross at a Mass celebrated by Pope Benedict XVI in St Peter's Square in the Vatican on 17 October 2010” (Thorpe, 1974). Therefore, while Mary as a film provides some insight into the life of Mary MacKillop, a modern biopic would be a fantastic way to commemorate, get to know, and fully appreciate Australia’s first saint, and her ongoing impact on the lives of Catholics today. It would also be very cool if the students at St. Luke’s in MacKillop house could have an excursion to Event Cinemas (my hand is already up to go!).



References:


Bible Gateway. (2023). "Luke 10: 25-37 - New International Version’”, https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke%2010%3A25-37&version=NIV, accessed on 5/3/23

Osmund Thorpe, 'MacKillop, Mary Helen (1842–1909)', Australian Dictionary of Biography, National Centre of Biography, Australian National University, https://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/mackillop-mary-helen-4112/text6575, published first in hardcopy 1974, accessed online 5 March 2023.

ROME REPORTS in English. 2009, Mary MacKillop, the first Australian Saint, online video, viewed on 5 March 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXNYxfURQnQ

9 views0 comments

In yesterday's lesson within the unit, Film Genres and National Cinemas, students began their genre deep dive investigation into biopic genre films. Like all films, biopics provide a representation of a story, with layers of meaning and room for personal interpretation. It is however very important to keep in mind that there is almost always more to the story, and that audiences viewing biopics should also conduct their own research and fact checking. Without this, the truth may become buried under layers of glitter, gloss, and showmanship.


Short for biographical pictures, biopic films portray the life stories of real people. It is however important to keep in mind that nobody’s life could possibly fit into a two and a half hour time slot, and that the attention spans of audience members tend to wander. This causes for details to be left out, real people to be reimagined as characters, and their lives to be shoved into the meat grinder that is the ‘three act structure’, so that they can be packaged neatly with the unrealistic but perfect completeness of having a beginning, a middle, and an end. Thus, while films may be marketed as ‘based on a true story’, the key word to take into consideration here is ‘based’. Even if a biopic has a realistic and factual style, and keeps over-dramatisation to a minimum, there is still an inevitable process of selection and emphasis that takes place as the story is converted into a film. Even vigorous research is not enough to overcome inherent personal bias that a filmmaker takes into each of their projects. This is just like when a class of students studying the same novel will come up with different essays. Even if there are popular points and quotations used for evidence, choosing what is most important to include is something that is the result of personal choice and perspective.


While biopics can certainly spark interest in different topics, social issues, and invite the audience to empathise with a range of characters and life experiences, it can be problematic if a film becomes the beginning as well as the end of a person’s investigation into the story. While we looked at a range of biopics, the film that appeared to strike the deepest chord in the class was The Greatest Showman (2017). This beautiful musical drama film portrayed the story of PT Barnum, creator of the Barnum and Bailey ‘Greatest Show on Earth’ circus, and according to the film’s trailer, ‘show business’ itself. With a truly star studded cast including Zac Efron, Michelle Williams, Zendaya, and Australia’s own Hugh Jackman as PT Barnum, the film weaves an enchanting ‘rags to riches’ tale of an inventive and loving man with the idea that would change entertainment forever. While his idea was a ‘freak show’, featuring ‘human curiosities’, the problematic plan of getting these outcasts off the streets and into the spotlight was painted as a celebration of difference. Exploitation of persecuted individuals (those with physical deformities, and targets of racism and slander) was packaged as a mission to spread joy for audiences and performers alike. Barnum’s ‘white lies’ about his acts (i.e. he adds pillows to the fat man’s costume, and calls the man with hereditary hypertrichosis (aka werewolf syndrome) ‘Dog Boy’ on his promotional poster) are quickly dismissed as innocent and whimsical imaginings, as the audience sings along with this film that champions the resilience and imagination of this extraordinary man, and his ability to sell a controversial idea.


While The Greatest Showman is a beautiful musical drama film, it certainly isn’t an ethical or responsible biopic. In class, we began with a viewing of the trailer, which led into a discussion of the purpose, focus, and the intended target audience of this biopic. After coming to similar conclusions; that this film focuses on bravery and strength of character in the face of adversity, and that it would be a great viewing experience for families young and old, I read my class the following article from The Wrap. According to Lange in her piece entitled ‘Why Celebrate ‘Terrible’ PT Barnum at All in ‘The Greatest Showman’?’, Barnum lived a life funded by cruelty towards vulnerable people and animals alike. He introduced inhumane methods such as the bullhook (heavy metal baton with sharp hooked end) and hot pokers into elephant handling. Elephants shipped from Sri Lanka died on their way to America, and two beluga whales were dead within two days of being kept in the basement of his New York museum (Lange, 2017). While the film was still in production, PETA was in contact with the team in regards to their concerns of glorifying a person who had caused so much pain. They did however commend the film for using computer generated animals in the film rather than life ones.


In regards to his mistreatment of people, while you may have heard of the bearded lady, the fat man, and dog boy, you may not know that Barnum ‘owned’ an elderly, blind African American woman named Joice Heth, and “advertised her age as 161, and claimed that she had been nursemaid to the young George Washington” (American Social History Productions, 2023).While he made $1,500 a week from her, she received no pay. Barnum also identified himself as Heth’s ‘proprietor’, even though slavery had been abolished in New York for seven years already. This is certainly a confronting truth to face, especially when Hugh Jackman’s performance of PT Barnum is so loveable and very much like how we would imagine Walt Disney to behave. According to Lopez, Barnum is misrepresented as being a “white saviour” and an “able bodied ally” to those with visible disabilities (Lopez, 2017). This however was certainly not the case. The film itself with its modern and extravagant singing and dancing numbers also masks the reality of a real freak show. In the film, the cast of eccentric individuals are dressed to the nines and performing happily together on stage, whereas some of these people (or ‘sideshow attractions’) would be made to simply sit in cages while paying customers came to gawk at them. Freak show ‘talents’ were certainly not treated as respected performers, but as subhuman, and that was sadly the key selling point in this business.


Therefore, while The Greatest Showman is a wonderful film, it is a prime example of a biopic that leaves painful truths out for the sake of the narrative and commercial profit. It is definitely okay to enjoy the film, but it is also important in honour and respect of those who were hurt and exploited in the making of the Barnum and Bailey circus to be familiar with what really happened; the good and the bad.



References:


American Social History Productions, (2023). "The Joice Heth Exhibit’, https://lostmuseum.cuny.edu/archive/exhibit/heth, accessed on 2/3/23

Fox Family Entertainment. 2017, The Greatest Showman | Official Trailer [HD] | 20th Century FOX, online video, viewed on 2 March 2023, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AXCTMGYUg9A


Lange, L. (2017). "Why Celebrate ‘Terrible’ PT Barnum at All in ‘The Greatest Showman’? (Guest Blog)”, https://www.thewrap.com/celebrate-terrible-pt-barnum-greatest-showman-guest-blog/, accessed on 2/3/23

Lopez, K. (2017). “‘The Greatest Showman’ Fails Disabled Audiences by Masking P.T. Barnum’s Monstrous Past”, https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-greatest-showman-fails-disabled-audiences-by-masking-pt-barnums-monstrous-past, accessed on 2/3/23

21 views0 comments
bottom of page